summer, in the city.
Saturday, July 31, 2010 @ resolution
As computing power increases over time, as we understand how stuff works better, as we create better screens and such,

- reality as we know it is based on the premise of what we can feel (i.e. what we know that is true)
- such things we can feel are akin to inputs that we sense

- and our reality is formulated by a interpretation of such inputs when put together.

--------------------

- what if we are able to determine the maximum possible resolution of such inputs? (i.e. quantifying how well the eye can see, how sensitive is our sense of touch?)

- what if we are able to take this knowledge, and immerse a person into such an environment with inputs at or exceeding the above mentioned resolutions?

- would the person perceive such an environment to be real then?


----------------
Possible issues:
subject would most probably be used to the physics of his body in reality at time of immersion, and may thus probably detect the subtle changes in the physics of his body (i.e. resistance while bending arms due to sensors on it etc) ..... therefore being able to perceive his current environment that he is in to be one inconsistent with reality and thus not true?

Work around:
However, person may be conditioned to experiences given sufficient time / convincing, (as may be seen in such cases where people switch from being right handers to left handers, after extended periods, left hand use becomes natural.)
so if we are able to convince the person that what he is feeling is actually normal, (for example, telling him that he was involved in an accident/ was injured, so his arms would feel a little funny) there would exist a possibility in actually creating a seamless virtual environment for the person, removing the ability of him to identify which reality he is in.



Tuesday, July 27, 2010 @ Introspection
Usually, as it is usual, it is usual to ask the question - Was the student wise?

The conclusion our studies have reached states an empathetic no/nein/bu.

The reasons of which the assessments of that have led to this particular conclusion include :

1) The student

/

i lost track of what i was writing. Never mind then.

------------------------

Moving on, inception was awesome; but given the relative poorness of explanation of movies, and a persistent living in awe of the movie, i guess it would suffice to say that it features the wonderful Ellen Page (from Juno), the perfectly adequate Joseph-Gordon Levitt (from 500 days of summer), and the gritty Leonard Dicaprico (from The Blood Diamond). The actors from the past few favorite movies have come together. Pretty much sums it up better than the typical long winded explanation that i tried to give.

Taking the principle of relativity into account, today has been a short day . 4pm releases seem dreadfully early when the usual is 5pm.

School, is truly a drag.

Thursday, July 22, 2010 @ Gott bist ein astronaut.
~

Tuesday, July 20, 2010 @ eccentric orbits.
i need advice

Monday, July 19, 2010 @ wish i could tell you.
From the 19th of July to 13 September 2010
8 weeks from here to there.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Work EoM lecture today, rather interesting.
Chemistry going through Lecture, ok.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 weeks, 8 weeks. Not very many days to dance with.
8 weeks, 8 weeks.
8 weeks, 8 weeks.

sigh.

Thursday, July 08, 2010 @ Needs and wants.
Wants : ejection handle.

Tuesday, July 06, 2010 @
Δ

somebody told me.


thanksgiving
.fourth!Romance is the designer.
Inspiration from Exuvalia and mintypeach.